Skip to content
EN
EnglishENNederlandsNL
Free Automation Scan

Time Tracking & Billing for Professional Services

Turn recorded work into invoice-ready billing information with less manual follow-up

Time tracking and billing often become unnecessarily manual when employees submit time late, project references are incomplete, managers chase approvals and finance has to correct entries before billing can begin.

We connect the workflow from time entry through validation, project matching, billable classification, rate retrieval, review, approval and billing preparation. Routine administration can move automatically, while employees and authorised reviewers remain responsible for the accuracy of recorded time, billability, rates, adjustments and commercial decisions.

The result is fewer corrections, clearer visibility into approved and billable work and a more consistent handover from delivery into invoicing.

Get your free Automation Scan
Your time and billing workflow Connected
  1. Time submittedRecorded work enters the approved timesheet workflow
  2. Entries validatedRequired fields, projects and known rules checked
  3. Review approvedCorrections and authorised approvals coordinated
  4. Billing preparedApproved work handed over as invoice-ready information
Incomplete, unclear and conflicting entries go to your team.
Time accuracy, billability, rates and billing approval stay with the right people.

Time tracking and billing challenges

The challenges

Time tracking automation is not about watching employees more closely.

It is about reducing the administrative work required to turn recorded project activity into reliable billing information.

Professional-services firms often have time data spread across time-tracking tools, project systems, calendars, spreadsheets, CRM records and accounting software. Employees enter time, managers review it and finance then spends additional time checking whether the information is complete enough to prepare billing.

We connect these recurring steps while keeping accuracy and commercial judgement with the people responsible for them.

Time is recorded late, incompletely or in different formats

Time entry is easy to postpone when consultants and delivery teams are focused on client work.

By the end of the week, entries may be missing:

  • Dates
  • Project references
  • Task references
  • Activity types
  • Work descriptions
  • Billable classifications
  • Other required fields

Managers or finance teams then have to follow up manually.

A typical process may look like:

Week ends → Missing timesheets identified → Employees contacted → Entries submitted → Missing descriptions found → Employees contacted again

We can automate approved reminders and validation checks around the submission process.

For example:

Submission deadline approaching → Missing employees identified → Reminder sent → Time submitted → Required fields checked

The workflow can identify incomplete entries.

It cannot determine how many hours someone actually worked or create missing hours on their behalf.

Hours are linked to the wrong client, project or task

Employees may work across several clients and projects in the same week.

Project names can be similar.

Old project codes may still be visible.

The time-tracking system may not always contain the same structure as the project-management or CRM system.

As a result, hours are sometimes recorded against:

  • The wrong client
  • The wrong engagement
  • An inactive project
  • An incorrect task
  • A general code that later needs to be redistributed

These mistakes create corrections before billing and can also distort operational reporting.

We can use known client, project and task references to help validate submitted entries.

For example:

Time entry submitted → Project code checked → Project confirmed active → Client relationship confirmed → Entry continues

Or:

Time entry submitted → Project code not found → Entry flagged → Employee or reviewer asked to correct

Reliable matches can be automated.

Ambiguous entries remain under human review.

Billable status, rates and billing rules are difficult to apply consistently

Professional-services firms rarely have one billing rule for every client.

Different engagements may use:

  • Hourly billing
  • Role-based rates
  • Project-specific rates
  • Retainers
  • Fixed-fee arrangements
  • Included hours
  • Non-billable internal work
  • Different activity classifications
  • Different billing periods

Employees or finance teams then have to determine which rule applies.

We can apply predefined billing rules where they are clear.

For example:

Client = ABC → Project = Advisory Retainer → Activity = Included Service → Approved retainer rule applied

Or:

Consultant role = Senior Consultant → Project uses approved role-based rate → Rate retrieved from approved rate table

If two rules conflict or no approved rate is available, the workflow should stop and request review.

We do not independently decide which commercial rule should apply when the agreement is unclear.

Timesheet reviews and corrections depend on manual follow-up

Many firms still manage timesheet approval through email, chat or spreadsheet comments.

A manager receives a reminder.

Finds an unclear description.

Asks the employee to correct it.

Waits for the update.

Reviews the entry again.

Finance then checks whether approval has actually been completed.

We can turn this into a structured timesheet approval workflow.

For example:

Timesheet submitted → Validation completed → Project manager review requested → Correction required → Employee notified → Updated entry submitted → Review reopened

The workflow can track who currently owns the next step and whether a correction is still outstanding.

The reviewer still determines whether the submitted time is accurate and acceptable.

Finance lacks one reliable view of recorded, approved and invoice-ready work

Finance often needs to answer several questions before billing can begin:

Has everyone submitted their time?

Which entries are still awaiting approval?

Which hours are billable?

Which rates are missing?

Which corrections are still open?

Is the billing period actually ready to close?

When those answers sit across different systems, billing preparation slows down and approved work can be overlooked.

We can bring the operational status into one view.

That may include:

  • Missing submissions
  • Submitted time
  • Entries awaiting review
  • Rejected entries
  • Approved time
  • Billable time
  • Non-billable time
  • Missing rates
  • Exceptions
  • Billing-period status
  • Invoice-ready work

This gives finance and operations better visibility before the invoicing process starts.

What we automate

What we automate

Time-entry reminders and submission triggers

Timesheet follow-up often begins with someone manually checking who has not submitted time.

We can trigger approved reminders based on dates, project stages or missing submissions.

For example:

Friday afternoon → Submitted employees checked → Missing submissions identified → Reminder sent

Or:

Billing period closing tomorrow → Incomplete timesheets identified → Final reminder triggered

Reminder logic can be adapted to your organisational rules.

It might vary by team, project type or submission frequency.

Automation can remind employees that information is missing.

It does not create the missing time or assume work was performed.

Client, project and task matching

A submitted entry needs to connect to the correct engagement before it can be used reliably.

We can validate known references against connected project, CRM or time-tracking records.

For example:

Employee selects project reference → Active project confirmed → Client relationship matched → Task reference validated

Where reliable identifiers exist, the workflow can automatically link the entry.

If the match is unclear:

Time entry submitted → Two possible projects found → Entry marked for review → Employee asked to confirm

The workflow should not guess between ambiguous clients or projects.

Required-field and timesheet validation

Finance teams often discover incomplete entries only after the submission deadline has passed.

We can check submitted timesheets for required information immediately.

That may include:

  • Date
  • Hours
  • Client
  • Project
  • Task
  • Activity type
  • Description
  • Billable indicator
  • Required project code
  • Other predefined fields

For example:

Time submitted → Required fields checked → Description missing → Entry returned for completion

Or:

Time submitted → All required fields present → Entry moves to classification

Validation checks structure.

They do not confirm that the entered hours or description are factually accurate.

Activity and work-description preparation

Work descriptions are often inconsistent.

One employee writes a detailed description.

Another enters a few words.

A third uses internal shorthand that is difficult for finance or the client-facing billing team to understand.

AI can help organise descriptions that employees have actually provided.

For example:

Employee enters “call client re implementation issues + follow-up config” → Description structured → Proposed wording prepared → Employee or reviewer checks

AI may help:

  • Clean up supplied descriptions
  • Group related activities
  • Summarise longer notes
  • Suggest a consistent format
  • Identify descriptions that appear incomplete
  • Prepare clearer billing-support text

AI must never invent work that was not recorded.

It also must not create hours based on calendar activity, project tasks or assumptions.

Billable and non-billable classification

Employees may need to classify time as billable, non-billable or covered by another billing arrangement.

Where the rules are clear, we can apply them automatically.

For example:

Activity = Internal Team Meeting → Approved rule = Non-billable → Classification applied

Or:

Project = Fixed-fee Implementation → Time retained for project reporting → Billing classification handled according to approved project rule

Where classification requires judgement:

Activity description unclear → No reliable billing rule found → Suggested classification prepared → Manager review requested

Automation applies approved rules.

The firm remains responsible for whether work should actually be charged to the client.

Rate and billing-rule retrieval

Rates are often stored in contracts, spreadsheets, accounting systems or project records.

Finance then searches for the correct information while preparing the billing summary.

We can retrieve approved billing information from designated sources.

That may include:

  • Standard rate cards
  • Client-specific rates
  • Project-specific rates
  • Role-based rates
  • Retainer arrangements
  • Included-hour rules
  • Fixed-fee project references
  • Other approved billing structures

For example:

Client + project + consultant role matched → Approved project rate retrieved → Rate attached to billing record

If no valid rate exists:

Approved rate not found → Billing preparation paused → Finance reviewer notified

Automation does not choose an unapproved rate simply to complete the process.

Review, correction and approval routing

Timesheets often need review before they can be used for billing.

Different projects may also have different approvers.

We can route submitted time to the correct reviewer according to approved rules.

For example:

Timesheet submitted → Project identified → Project manager assigned as reviewer → Review request created

If a correction is required:

Reviewer rejects entry → Reason recorded → Employee notified → Correction submitted → Review restarted

The workflow can track:

  • Submitted
  • Awaiting review
  • Correction required
  • Resubmitted
  • Approved
  • Rejected
  • Blocked

The actual approval remains a human decision.

Billing-period checks and closure

Closing a billing period often requires finance to confirm that every relevant timesheet is complete.

We can perform structured checks before the period is prepared for billing.

That may include:

  • Required employees submitted
  • Required projects reviewed
  • Corrections completed
  • Approvals recorded
  • Rates available
  • Billable classification resolved
  • Exceptions cleared
  • Other required checks completed

For example:

Month-end reached → Timesheets checked → Two approvals missing → Billing period remains Open → Reviewers notified

Once the required conditions are met:

All required approvals complete → Exceptions cleared → Period marked Ready for Billing Preparation

The workflow can enforce your closure requirements.

Authorised finance or operational staff remain responsible for the final closure decision where required.

Invoice-ready summaries and billing handover

After time has been validated and approved, finance still needs to prepare information for invoicing.

That may currently involve copying hours and rates into spreadsheets or accounting systems.

We can prepare structured invoice-ready information using approved entries.

That may include:

  • Client
  • Project
  • Billing period
  • Approved hours
  • Approved descriptions
  • Approved rates
  • Billing classification
  • Engagement reference
  • Other billing fields

For example:

Approved billable time → Entries grouped by client and project → Approved rate applied → Invoice-ready billing summary prepared

The workflow prepares the billing information.

It does not create the final commercial invoice decision.

The process ends when approved billing information is handed over to the invoicing workflow.

Time and billing dashboards

Managers and finance teams often have to open several tools to understand the status of the billing cycle.

We can create an operational dashboard showing the current time and billing workflow.

That may include:

  • Missing timesheets
  • Submission status
  • Recorded hours
  • Approved hours
  • Billable hours
  • Non-billable hours
  • Entries requiring correction
  • Missing rates
  • Approval status
  • Billing exceptions
  • Billing-period readiness
  • Invoice-ready work

For example:

Finance opens dashboard → Three timesheets missing → One rate exception open → 24 approved entries ready for billing handover

The dashboard improves visibility.

It should not be used to infer employee performance without appropriate context, organisational rules and human judgement.

Predictable time administration, human control

Exceptions

Predictable time administration can run automatically.

Accuracy, commercial decisions and final approval remain with people.

Time data affects both client billing and internal project reporting, so unclear entries should not be silently corrected by automation.

Realistic exceptions include:

  • Missing time entries
  • Missing descriptions
  • Unknown client or project
  • Closed or inactive project
  • Duplicate entries
  • Implausible or conflicting hours
  • Time submitted outside the allowed period
  • Unclear billable status
  • Missing rate
  • Conflicting rate rules
  • Work outside the approved scope
  • Requested correction
  • Timesheet rejected
  • Missing approver
  • Approval overdue
  • Billing period closed while entries remain incomplete
  • Integration or synchronisation errors
  • Approved totals that do not match the billing summary

The workflow gathers the available context and sends the issue to the appropriate person.

It must never guess or fabricate missing time, rates or commercial decisions.

For example:

Time entry submitted → Project marked inactive → Employee selected project from old list → Entry blocked → Project details attached → Employee and project manager asked to confirm correct engagement

Or:

Approved hours = 42 → Billing summary shows 38 → Difference detected → Source entries and billing calculation attached → Finance review requested → Billing handover paused

Automation helps identify and organise the problem.

The authorised employee decides the correction.

How it works

How it works

  1. 1

    Work is connected to the correct client and project structure

    The workflow begins with the client, project and task structure that already exists in your connected systems.

    Projects can carry the approved references needed for time entry and billing preparation.

    That may include client IDs, engagement codes, project status and relevant billing rules.

    Automation can synchronise known references where technically supported.

    Your team remains responsible for maintaining the underlying project and commercial structure.

  2. 2

    Employees record and submit their time

    Employees record the time they actually worked using the approved time-entry process.

    The system may request fields such as:

    • Date
    • Hours
    • Client
    • Project
    • Task
    • Activity
    • Description

    Approved reminders can be triggered when submissions are missing.

    Automation can support the process.

    It must never invent time or create false records of work.

  3. 3

    Required fields and known references are checked

    Submitted entries are validated against the required structure.

    The workflow can identify missing fields, invalid project references, inactive projects and other known issues.

    Reliable client and project references can be matched automatically.

    Anything ambiguous goes back to the employee or the appropriate reviewer.

    The workflow checks consistency.

    It does not verify that the employee actually worked the submitted hours.

  4. 4

    Billable status and approved billing rules are applied

    The workflow checks the submitted entry against approved billing rules.

    Clear classifications or rates can be retrieved automatically.

    For example:

    Client + project + activity matched → Approved billing rule found → Classification applied

    When the commercial rule is unclear, the entry goes to review.

    The workflow does not decide independently that the client should be charged.

  5. 5

    Timesheets and exceptions are routed for review

    Submitted time moves to the relevant project manager, delivery lead or finance reviewer according to your approval structure.

    Reviewers receive the entry together with the available context.

    They can approve it, reject it or request a correction.

    The workflow tracks the current status and ownership.

    The reviewer remains responsible for judging accuracy and billability.

  6. 6

    Approved corrections and adjustments are processed

    When an entry requires a change, the workflow can route it back to the appropriate person and track the correction.

    For example:

    Reviewer requests project-code correction → Employee notified → Updated entry submitted → Validation rerun → Review reopened

    Adjustments or write-offs can also follow the approval process defined by your organisation.

    Automation records and routes the decision.

    It does not decide whether the adjustment should be accepted.

  7. 7

    Invoice-ready time and billing information is prepared

    Once the required entries have been validated and approved, the workflow can prepare a structured billing summary.

    Approved hours can be grouped by:

    • Client
    • Project
    • Period
    • Activity
    • Consultant
    • Rate type
    • Other approved billing dimensions

    The resulting information can include the references required by finance or the invoicing system.

    This is billing preparation, not final invoice creation.

  8. 8

    Approved billing data is transferred to the invoicing workflow

    Once the billing period is approved for handover, the structured billing data can be sent to the next process.

    That may mean passing approved time and rate information into an accounting system, invoicing platform or separate invoicing workflow.

    For example:

    Billing period approved → Invoice-ready summary confirmed → Approved billing records transferred → Handover status recorded

    The invoicing process can then create and review the outgoing invoice according to your separate billing controls.

Routine time administration continues automatically while time accuracy, billability, rates, adjustments, write-offs and final billing approval remain under human control.

From manual to automated

Before and after

Before

  1. 1Employees reminded manually
  2. 2Timesheets submitted late
  3. 3Missing descriptions identified
  4. 4Employees contacted again
  5. 5Project codes corrected
  6. 6Billable status checked manually
  7. 7Rate information searched for
  8. 8Manager approval requested by email
  9. 9Corrections sent back
  10. 10Updated timesheets checked again
  11. 11Missing approvals chased
  12. 12Billable totals copied into spreadsheet
  13. 13Finance compares several systems
  14. 14Billing summary prepared manually
  15. 15Invoice information entered separately

After

  1. 1Submission period starts
  2. 2Reminders sent
  3. 3Time submitted
  4. 4Required information checked
  5. 5Client and project references validated
  6. 6Approved billing rules applied
  7. 7Exceptions reviewed
  8. 8Timesheets approved
  9. 9Invoice-ready summary prepared
  10. 10Approved data transferred to invoicing

Less manual time administration means fewer repeated checks between employees, project managers and finance. Missing information becomes visible earlier, approval ownership is clearer and invoice-ready work can move into the invoicing process in a more consistent way.

Our services in practice

How our services support Time Tracking & Billing for Professional Services

AI agents

Our AI agents can support the parts of time administration that involve unstructured descriptions and contextual information.

Employees may use different wording for similar activities.

Long descriptions may need to be shortened for a billing summary.

A vague entry may need clarification before approval.

We can use AI agents to help:

  • Structure submitted work descriptions
  • Summarise longer activity notes
  • Suggest known project or activity classifications
  • Identify descriptions that may be incomplete
  • Prepare context for reviewers
  • Group related submitted activities
  • Standardise wording for working billing summaries

For example:

Employee description submitted → Relevant project context retrieved → Suggested activity classification prepared → Reviewer checks

AI does not invent hours.

It does not claim work was performed, determine employee performance or approve billing decisions.

Recorded time and commercial judgement remain with employees and authorised reviewers.

Workflow automation

Our workflow automation connects the recurring time and billing-preparation process.

For example:

Submission period opens → Reminders sent → Time submitted → Validation completed → Billing rules applied → Review routed → Corrections processed → Period approved → Billing handover prepared

The workflow can coordinate:

  • Submission schedules
  • Timesheet reminders
  • Validation
  • Project matching
  • Classification
  • Rate retrieval
  • Review
  • Corrections
  • Approval
  • Billing-period checks
  • Closure
  • Invoice-ready summaries
  • Invoicing handover
  • Exception routing

This reduces manual follow-up without removing employee or reviewer responsibility.

System integrations

Our system integrations connect the tools involved in time recording and billing preparation.

Depending on your setup, this may include:

  • Time-tracking software
  • Project-management platforms
  • CRM systems
  • Calendars
  • Accounting software
  • Invoicing systems
  • Resource-planning tools
  • Internal databases
  • Other operational systems

For example, active project references from your project system can be made available to the time-tracking workflow, while approved billing information can later be passed to your accounting environment.

Calendar data may support context where appropriate, but it should not automatically be treated as proof that billable work occurred.

The exact integration possibilities depend on APIs, permissions and the technical capabilities of each system.

Dashboards & portals

Our dashboards & portals can provide a clearer view of time and billing status.

An internal dashboard could show:

  • Employees with missing submissions
  • Recorded time
  • Submitted timesheets
  • Approval status
  • Corrections required
  • Billable time
  • Non-billable time
  • Missing rates
  • Exceptions
  • Billing-period status
  • Invoice-ready work

Finance can see which work is ready for handover.

Project managers can see which timesheets are waiting for review.

Operations can see recurring process issues.

A secure employee or manager portal can also support:

  • Time submissions
  • Missing-information requests
  • Corrections
  • Timesheet reviews
  • Approvals
  • Exception handling

Access should remain proportionate to each person's role and the information they need.

Custom software

Our custom software can support time and billing workflows that do not fit standard time-tracking or finance software.

We can build focused tools such as:

  • Time-entry interfaces
  • Manager approval workspaces
  • Billing-rule tools
  • Rate-management interfaces
  • Exception queues
  • Billing-period review screens
  • Multi-project billing dashboards
  • Invoice-ready summary tools
  • Interfaces connecting time, project and finance systems

For example, a consultancy may need one review workspace where project managers can see submitted time, project context, billability and open corrections without moving between several applications.

Another firm may need different billing logic for retainers, fixed-fee work and hourly engagements.

We build custom software when it solves a specific operational gap rather than replacing existing systems without a clear reason.

Human control, built in

Human control

Time tracking automation should reduce administration without taking responsibility for recorded work or commercial billing decisions away from the people who own them.

We design the workflow around clear organisational rules, proportionate access and appropriate privacy controls.

Automatic

Reliable administrative actions can happen automatically when the required information and rules are clear.

That can include:

  • Opening submission periods
  • Sending approved timesheet reminders
  • Checking required fields
  • Validating known client references
  • Validating known project references
  • Identifying missing descriptions
  • Applying clear predefined classifications
  • Retrieving approved rates
  • Creating review tasks
  • Routing corrections
  • Updating timesheet status
  • Tracking approvals
  • Checking billing-period completeness
  • Preparing invoice-ready summaries
  • Updating operational dashboards

These steps reduce repetitive process administration.

They do not create or approve time on behalf of employees.

Review required

Some information or proposed decisions still require employee judgement.

That can include:

  • Suggested activity classifications
  • Unclear billable status
  • Unusual work descriptions
  • Project mismatches
  • Proposed rate selection where several rules may apply
  • Timesheet corrections
  • Adjustments
  • Write-offs
  • Time outside the normal submission period
  • Work that may fall outside approved scope
  • Billing-period readiness

The workflow prepares the available context.

The authorised employee makes the decision.

Exception

Blocked, sensitive or conflicting situations go directly to an authorised employee.

Examples include:

  • Missing time
  • Duplicate time
  • Implausible or conflicting hours
  • Unknown client
  • Inactive project
  • Missing rate
  • Conflicting billing rules
  • Rejected timesheet
  • Missing approver
  • Unresolved correction
  • Scope concerns
  • Billing totals that do not reconcile
  • Integration failure
  • Closed billing period with incomplete entries
  • Privacy or access concerns

The professional-services firm remains responsible for recorded time, employee guidance, billability, rates, commercial agreements, adjustments, write-offs and final billing approval.

We do not force these situations into an automated outcome.

The NexFlow method

Our approach

01

SCAN

We map the complete time-tracking and billing-preparation workflow.

We look at:

  • Time-entry process
  • Submission schedules
  • Employee reminders
  • Client references
  • Project references
  • Task structures
  • Required fields
  • Activity classifications
  • Billable rules
  • Rate sources
  • Approval processes
  • Correction workflows
  • Billing periods
  • Finance handovers
  • Invoice-ready summaries
  • Existing dashboards
  • System integrations
  • Privacy and access rules
  • Recurring exceptions

We identify where employees, managers and finance teams repeatedly chase information, correct timesheets or move billing data between systems.

02

CALCULATE

We estimate the recurring administrative time involved in the current process.

That may include:

  • Chasing missing timesheets
  • Checking incomplete entries
  • Correcting client references
  • Correcting project codes
  • Reviewing descriptions
  • Applying billing classifications
  • Searching for rates
  • Requesting manager approval
  • Processing corrections
  • Checking approval status
  • Reconciling billing totals
  • Preparing billing summaries
  • Re-entering information into finance systems

This helps us identify where timesheet automation and billing automation for professional services can reduce unnecessary process work.

We do not invent financial outcomes before analysing the current process.

03

AUTOMATE

We build the approved workflow around your existing time-tracking, project, CRM, finance and invoicing systems.

That can include:

  • Submission reminders
  • Required-field validation
  • Project matching
  • Classification rules
  • Approved rate retrieval
  • Timesheet approval workflows
  • Correction routing
  • Billing-period controls
  • Invoice-ready summaries
  • Finance handovers
  • Dashboards
  • Exception handling

We define what can happen automatically and where employees, managers or finance need to make a decision.

The process ends with approved billing information ready for the invoicing workflow.

04

OPTIMIZE

Time and billing processes change as your organisation grows.

You may add:

  • New services
  • New teams
  • Different project types
  • New billing models
  • Updated rates
  • Different approval rules
  • New time-tracking systems
  • Different accounting software
  • Additional client requirements

We can adapt the workflow as these changes introduce new validation rules, billing logic and approval requirements.

We also use recurring exceptions to identify where the process can become easier to manage and more reliable.

Your questions, answered

FAQ

Which time-tracking and billing tasks can be automated?

Many recurring administrative tasks can be automated.

That can include reminders, required-field validation, client and project matching, approved billing-rule application, rate retrieval, approval routing, correction workflows, billing-period checks and invoice-ready summary preparation.

Automation can also provide better visibility into missing entries and approved billable work.

Employees and authorised reviewers remain responsible for whether recorded time is accurate and whether it should be billed.

Can employees receive automatic timesheet reminders?

Yes.

Reminders can be triggered according to your preferred schedule or submission rules.

For example:

Friday 15:00 → Submission status checked → Employees with missing time identified → Reminder sent

You can also use different reminder rules for different teams or billing periods.

The purpose is to reduce manual follow-up, not to create an employee-surveillance system.

Can time entries be matched to the correct client and project?

Yes, where reliable identifiers are available.

The workflow can validate client, project and task references against connected systems.

For example:

Project code submitted → Project found → Project active → Client relationship confirmed

If the reference is unclear or several projects could match, the entry goes to review.

The workflow should not guess between ambiguous projects.

Can AI create or complete time entries automatically?

AI may help structure a description that an employee has already provided or suggest a known classification.

It must not invent hours or claim that work was performed.

For example, calendar events or completed project tasks should not automatically become time entries simply because they exist.

Employees remain responsible for recording the time they actually worked.

AI can support administration around that information, not fabricate it.

Can billable and non-billable time be classified automatically?

Yes, where your organisation has clear, approved rules.

For example:

Activity = Internal Training → Rule = Non-billable → Classification applied

Other activities may depend on the client agreement, project scope or context.

Those cases can receive a suggested classification and go to an authorised reviewer.

Automation does not independently determine that the client should be charged.

Can different clients, projects and roles use different billing rates?

Yes.

The workflow can retrieve rates based on predefined structures such as:

  • Client
  • Project
  • Service
  • Employee role
  • Engagement type
  • Rate card
  • Other approved fields

For example:

Client A + Advisory Project + Senior Consultant → Approved project rate retrieved

If several rates appear valid or no approved rate can be found, the case goes to finance or another authorised reviewer.

Automation does not invent or select unapproved rates.

Can timesheet reviews and approvals be routed automatically?

Yes.

Reviewers can be selected using rules based on project ownership, team structure or engagement type.

For example:

Timesheet submitted → Project recognised → Project manager identified → Approval request created

Corrections can be routed back to the employee and automatically returned to the reviewer after resubmission.

The reviewer still makes the approval decision.

What happens when a time entry is incomplete or appears incorrect?

The workflow can flag the entry and stop it from moving to billing preparation.

For example:

Entry submitted → Description missing → Validation fails → Employee asked to complete entry

Or:

12 hours recorded against a project with conflicting information → Entry marked for review → Manager receives entry and project context

The workflow can detect predefined inconsistencies.

It does not decide what actually happened or fabricate a correction.

Can approved time be transferred into our accounting or invoicing software?

Yes, where the relevant systems support the required integrations.

Approved time, project references, descriptions, rates and other billing fields can be prepared and transferred into the next billing process.

For example:

Timesheets approved → Billing summary created → Finance confirms period → Approved billing records transferred to invoicing system

The final invoice still follows the separate invoicing and commercial approval process.

Can retainers, fixed-fee projects and time-based billing use different workflows?

Yes.

Different billing models can follow different rules.

For example, hourly work may create invoice-ready hours, while time on a fixed-fee project may primarily support project monitoring rather than direct invoice calculation.

Retainer work may need checks against included services or hours.

We can build different workflow paths for each approved billing model.

Commercial interpretation of an unclear agreement remains with your team.

Do we need to replace our current time-tracking software?

Not necessarily.

We start with the time-tracking, project and finance tools your organisation already uses.

Where possible, we connect the existing systems and automate the process between them.

If a required workflow cannot be supported, we can consider additional automation logic, dashboards or focused custom software.

The goal is to improve the time and billing integration rather than replace tools without a clear operational reason.

How do you handle privacy and employee monitoring concerns?

Time-tracking automation should be designed around legitimate administrative needs rather than excessive monitoring.

We focus on processes such as missing submissions, required fields, project matching, approvals and billing preparation.

Access to employee time information should be proportionate to a person's role.

Your organisation should define clear policies around what is collected, why it is collected, who can access it and how long it is retained.

Automation should support those rules rather than turning time data into an automated judgement about employee performance.

Billing should not depend on someone manually chasing every timesheet and correction

When time entries, project information, approvals, billing rules and finance systems are disconnected, employees, project managers and finance teams spend too much time correcting information and checking whether work is ready for billing.

We map your time-tracking and billing workflow and identify where reminders, validation, project matching, approved billing rules, reviews, corrections and billing preparation can be automated while keeping recorded time, billability, rates, adjustments and commercial decisions with the right people.

Get your free Automation Scan

Find out which parts of your time-tracking and billing workflow we can automate.